Ne, CC, dein System ist insgesamt einfach schneller. Gefährlich werden dir erst Systeme ab der 9500 Pro und ab Athlon XP 2000.
para

Ich habe bei 3dmark01 so um die 10000punkte, aber die meisten mit meiner graka und sogar schlechterem Prozessor schaffen 12000
Aber solange sich das beim spielen oder so nicht bemerkbar macht ists mir recht egal

[ 15. März 2003, 15:37: Beitrag editiert von: Crispy chicken ]

</font><blockquote>Zitat:</font><hr />Original erstellt von Crispy chicken:
aber mal mit anderen vergleichen kann man ja mal..
</font>[/QUOTE]*g* Klar, kann man. Ist aber vollkommen sinnfrei.

Einige Zitate aus http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NDI4LDQ= :

"Looking at the GeForceFX its initial scores with the 42.63 drivers are horrible compared to the 9700 Pro."

"But the GeForceFX, with a new set of drivers [42.67], has now beaten the 9700 Pro in the overall 3DMark result."

"Is 3DMark03 really a good indication of what “Real World” gaming is? Is 3DMark03 really "forward looking"?

With all that we have seen so far it does not appear to actually give us any indication how video cards are going to compare in any real games. It produces an overall 3DMark which is taken from unbalanced game tests. Furthermore as we have seen directly above in the benchmarks, drivers can be optimized to run the game tests faster. The problem is this is just a benchmark and not based on any real world gaming engines. Therefore while you may get a higher 3DMark number you will not see ANY increase in performance in any games that are out there."

"In closing, Kyle has informed me that [H]ard|OCP will not be using the overall 3DMark03 score to evaluate video cards."

Letzteres übrigens wie alle seriösen Hardwareseiten.

Cobra